Extradite pair to face ‘honour killing’ trial or undermine global justice, lawyer says

Canada could undermine the global justice system by failing to extradite a pair accused of orchestrating the honour killing of a 25-year-old B.C. woman, a government lawyer argued today before the Supreme Court of Canada.

Janet Henchey, a lawyer for the Attorney General of Canada, made the case to extradite two B.C. residents to India to face trial for their role in the murder of Jaswinder (Jassi) Sidhu in 2000.

India has requested the extradition of Malkit Sidhu and Surjit Badesha, the mother and uncle of Jassi. Her body was dumped after her throat was slashed, and her young husband, Sukhwinder (Mithu) Sidhu was badly beaten and left for dead.

The pair has argued they could face neglect or mistreatment in India’s prison system, but Henchey argued any potential risks are general in nature, not “personalized” to the pair. Henchey noted that all countries have problems such as overcrowding in prisons, including Canada.

She said the case before the high court has broad implications for Canada’s role in administering international justice.

“It undermines the entire concept of extradition and sending people to the country where they have allegedly committed a crime if we refuse to surrender based on imperfections in our treaty partners, even sometimes large imperfections, without a more specific connection to the person sought’s situation,” she said.

“If we do that, we fail to recognize the importance of extradition to the international community as a mechanism for avoiding impunity.”

A surrender order signed by former Justice Minister Peter MacKay was challenged and ultimately struck down by a B.C. appeals court last year.

Henchey said a majority on the bench “erred” in that decision and relied on a “false factual record.”

Janet Henchey

Janet Henchey, a lawyer for the Attorney General of Canada, argues for the extradition of two B.C. residents accused of arranging the “honour killing” of Jassi Sidhu. (CBC)

She also argued that India has provided assurances that Sidhu and Badesha would have access to medical treatment and would not be mistreated.

But lawyers for the accused argue those assurances are not enough to protect the pair, and that sending them to India would violate their constitutional rights under section seven of the Charter, which guarantees the right to life, liberty, and security of the person.

Badesha’s lawyer Michael Klein said the issue of assurances is not in question, but whether India can deliver on them.

He said India has a fundamental, systemic problem with its prison system that puts anyone at risk. It is also unclear what constitutes “reasonable efforts” by India to ensure Badesha and Sidhu’s safety, he said.

Human rights concerns

“That is what this case really wrestles with,” Klein said.

Klein said Canada has a high standard for values and human rights and must ensure that rights are not violated in the course of executing international treaties.

Uncle and mother of Jassi Sidhu in 2012 court sketch

Surjit Singh Badesha (left) and Malkit Kaur Sidhu were arrested in 2012 for allegedly conspiring to murder Jassi Sidhu in Punjab, India in 2000. The pair, pictured in this 2012 court sketch, is fighting extradition to face trial in India. (Court sketch/CBC)

At age 25, Sidhu was allegedly targeted for secretly marrying a man of much lower social status instead of the older man her family had arranged for her to wed in Canada.

Her mother’s lawyer David Crossin argued that MacKay did not receive “meaningful” assurances she would not be tortured or mistreated in custody while awaiting trial.

Any assurance that India would follow obligations “rings hollow,” because torture has become institutionalized in India’s justice system, he said.

Crossin also said Sidhu could face sexual violence if sent to India.

Jassi Sidhu

Jassi Sidhu, right, was murdered after she secretly married Mithu Sidhu in India in 2000. (Family photo)

Posted on; CBC.ca>>

Check Also

Michael Harris

Loblaws plans to close 22 unprofitable stores and launch home delivery


Loblaws said Wednesday it plans to close 22 unprofitable stores. The retailer also says it will begin rolling out an internet-based home-delivery service starting in December.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *